|
Working for a PERS Agency
Post-Retirement Poses Traps for the Unwary
Many public employees retire from
agencies that contract with the California Public Employees’
Retirement System ("PERS") while still in their 50s and able
to work. As a result, some choose to work after retirement.
Their experience makes them desirable employees for public
agencies, including those that contract with PERS for
retirement benefits. When a PERS retiree performs
post-retirement work for the same or another PERS agency, both
the employer and the employee must be aware of the
restrictions placed on such work.
Restrictions on Post-Retirement Work
The restrictions on post-retirement work are set forth in the
Public Employees’ Retirement Law (Government Code § 20000, et
seq., the "PERL") at Government Code §§ 21220-21230. There are
some types of post-retirement work that are specifically
allowed by statute, but these are limited. Some of the
positions allowed include the following (there are others):
(1) appointment to a board or commission of a public entity;
(2) employment as a school crossing guard, a juror or election
officer, or as an elected official; and (e) certain teaching
positions (with an annual maximum number of hours that can be
worked).
Since not all retirees want to be employed in the
occupations specified above, they can instead utilize
Government Code § 21221(h). This statute allows a retiree to
work in a wide variety of disciplines without penalty, but
does have its own limitations. It states,
Upon appointment by the governing body of a contracting
agency to a position deemed by the governing body to be of a
limited duration and requiring specialized skills or during
an emergency to prevent stoppage of public business. These
appointments, in addition to any made pursuant to Section
21224, shall not exceed a total for all employers of
960-hours in any calendar year. When an appointment is
expected to, or will, exceed 960-hours in any calendar year,
the governing body shall request approval from the board to
extend the temporary employment. The governing body shall
present a resolution to the board requesting action to allow
or disallow the employment extension. The resolution shall
be presented prior to the expiration of the 960-hour maximum
for the calendar year. The appointment shall continue until
notification of the board’s decision is received by the
governing body. The appointment shall be deemed approved if
the board fails to take action within 60 days of receiving
the request. Appointments under this subdivision may not
exceed a total of one year.
Given the above, the parameters of post-retirement work
under this section are:
- Limited duration;
- Specialized skills;
- 960 hours or less per calendar year; and
- The appointment may not exceed one year.
Sometimes retirees and employees attempt to create
independent contractor-client relationships rather than an
employer-employee relationship. Doing so may be desirable for
numerous reasons, including that the 960 hour limit is
inapplicable. However, if the relationship has the attributes
of an employer-employee relationship, PERS can claim that the
PERL’s post-retirement work restrictions apply. Whether the
relationship is employer-employee or independent
contractor-client requires an analysis of numerous factors.
The most critical of those factors is whether the public
agency has control over the day to day work, which suggests an
employer-employee relationship. If the public agency can only
control the end product, that suggests an independent
contractor-client relationship. Given the individualized
analysis necessary to determine how the relationship should be
characterized, public agencies and retirees contemplating an
independent contractor-client relationship should seek legal
advice as to the risks involved in their particular situation.
Consequences for Violating the PERL's Restrictions on
Post-Retirement Work
Government Code Section 21220 sets forth various penalties
that are imposed on the retiree and post-retirement employer
when post-retirement work violates the PERL. It states,
(a) A person who has been retired under this system, for
service or for disability, may not be employed in any capacity
thereafter by the state, the university, a school employer, or
a contracting agency, unless the employment qualifies for
service credit in the University of California Retirement
System or the State Teachers’ Retirement Plan, unless he or
she has first been reinstated from retirement pursuant to this
chapter, or unless the employment, without reinstatement, is
authorized by this article. A retired person whose employment
without reinstatement is authorized by this article shall
acquire no service credit or retirement rights under this part
with respect to the employment.
(b) Any retired member employed in violation of this
article shall:
(1) Reimburse this system for any retirement allowance
received during the period or periods of employment that are
in violation of law.
(2) Pay to this system an amount of money equal to the
employee contributions that would otherwise have been paid
during the period or periods of unlawful employment, plus
interest thereon.
(3) Contribute toward reimbursement of this system for
administrative expenses incurred in responding to this
situation, to the extent the member is determined by the
executive officer to be at fault.
(c) Any public employer that employs a retired member in
violation of this article shall:
(1) Pay to this system an amount of money equal to employer
contributions that would otherwise have been paid for the
period or periods of time that the member is employed in
violation of this article, plus interest thereon.
(2) Contribute toward reimbursement of this system for
administrative expenses incurred in responding to this
situation, to the extent the employer is determined by the
executive officer of this system to be at fault."’
In addition to the above penalties, the employee could be
reinstated by PERS as a member. If reinstated, the employee
will no longer receive retirement benefits but will be treated
as any other active PERS member.
Conclusion
It is important for PERS retirees and their potential
employers to ensure that the post-retirement work meets the
PERL’s guidelines. If not, both could face costly penalties.
Given all the potential working relationships that retirees
and public employers can enter into, legal advice should be
sought to ensure that the particular arrangement reached by
the parties is in compliance with the PERL.
|