Our People

Steve M. Berliner

Partner, Los Angeles

310.981.2000
sberliner@lcwlegal.com

Steve joined the Los Angeles office in 1997 and has developed an extensive negotiation and litigation practice. Steve has expertise in advising and defending public agencies regarding the laws and regulations of public employee retirement plans, such as PERS, as well as on retiree health insurance issues. This includes advising and representing clients in administrative hearings and court as well as negotiating changes to retiree benefits.

Steve has expertise in the area of STRS, PERS, the County 1937 Retirement Act, and related retirement issues. He assists clients who have been audited by PERS in responding to the audit. He reviews the audit report and advises the client on the best course of action. This could include an appeal of PERS' findings.

Steve has developed an expertise in employee industrial disability retirement procedures. He represents clients in the administrative hearing and in court when employees challenge a denial of their industrial disability retirement application. Steve also advises clients with regard to their obligations and rights when dealing with injured and disabled employees.

Steve acts as chief negotiator for our clients in their labor negotiations with their employee associations. He advises clients on contract interpretation issues and represents clients in grievance matters.

Steve defends our clients in a wide range of lawsuits, including writs, breach of contract, the Fair Labor Standards Act, discrimination and harassment. In addition, Steve represents our clients in employee disciplinary hearings.

Representative Matters

Litigation

  • Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, a Division of the Rail Conference, International Brotherhood of Teamsters; Glenn William Steele v. Southern California Regional Rail Authority, d/b/a Metrolink (2011) - In a case handled by Steve Berliner and James Oldendorph of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore's Los Angeles office, the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled that Metrolink's installation and operation of an audio and video monitoring system in the cabs of Metrolink locomotives did not violate the locomotive engineers' privacy rights, due process rights, and that the actions were not preempted by state law.  The union for the engineers that operate the locomotives, and one individual engineer, had sued Metrolink seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, arguing that the engineers had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the cabs of the locomotives, and that Metrolink's monitoring system violated their procedural and substantive due process rights.  They also claimed that the installation of the cameras and the policy adopted to govern their use were preempted by state law. The Court granted Metrolink's motion for summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs' causes of action, finding that there were no issues of material fact warranting trial.  This ruling resulted in a victory for Metrolink on all claims.

Awards

Top Municipal Law Attorney, Daily Journal (2012)

Publications

Presentations

Education

  • JD, University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
  • BA, State University of New York at Binghamton
To Contact Liebert Cassidy Whitmore:
Los Angeles 310.981.2000 | Fresno 559.256.7800 | San Francisco 415.512.3000 | San Diego 619.481.5900 info@lcwlegal.com
© 2013 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore